9 Responses to “A Word… On The Latest “Controversy””

  1. Jerry says:

    Well said, sir. Who said the internet wasn\’t being used in a productive manner? Hell, we have five pages of people pissing and moaning about dick and fart jokes to prove otherwise. Viva la interporn!

  2. Drew Price says:

    The last three posts here have been ABOUT this issue. I\’d say if you want these things to go away, don\’t fucking post about them. You know??? Especially if you don\’t understand why people were upset by the column.

  3. Joey Manley says:

    I posted an apology for the column in the thread last night. I don\’t have the ability to edit the column itself (Jen does that), so my apology is (currently) at the end of page 5 on the thread. Thanks!

    Joey
    http://www.webcomicsnation.com

  4. -PookeyG- says:

    Dear Drew,

    Yeah, that\’s my bad. I didn\’t know there would be a third post on it. I apologize.

    Dear Joe,

    That was a very nice apology post and I respect that you did that. Thank you very much.

    -PookeyG-

  5. Scott Kurtz says:

    Discourse is good. And discourse on sites like Digital strips keeps it \”in the family\” so to speak. Everyone reading this are people making webcomics.

    Joey, where is the new column you were promising? Did you decide against it?

  6. Joey Manley says:

    I sent it to Jen a long time ago. Either she\’s decided to can my column, or she\’s been too busy to post it, or something. Either way, no big deal. It was not a trouble-making installment. And I\’ve decided to swear off writing columns for Pulse. More trouble than it\’s worth.

  7. William G says:

    I\’d say if you want these things to go away, don\’t fucking post about them. You know???

    And I agree with you. Funny, huh?

  8. bim reader says:

    trangely, this forum is not quite entirely invisible to some of us who merely read web comics with no pretention to create any.

    This discussion would justify a citation, I think, to Einstein\’s view of

    The frog-mouse battle
    .

    One thing to be said in favor of the basic gag comics whether or not they focus on bodily parts and functions. Their schedule works.

    I try to like the online \’graphic novels\’. Really I do. I try like heck to follow several of them. Even when the avante-garde art style makes them nearly impossible to \’read\’.

    Try as I might, however, I\’m constantly frustrated by the pace.

    Oh creators, a graphic novel is a novel. Sure, Dickens serialized novels, but not one paragraph of narrative at a time.

    For some comics, I try to discipline myself to stay away from them for a few weeks at a time so that they have a chance to build up a coherent lump of content.

    Wigu\’s status seems to reflect a creator who has the same reaction from the other side of the tablet.

    Maybe you\’d get a more illuminating conversation if you questioned the meaningful limits of the (on average) 4-panel-a-day format.

  9. William G says:

    You\’re frustrated by the glacial pace, bim_reader?

    Taking the liberty of speaking for my fellows: Us too.

    Unfortunately, the reading habits of the web demand regularity over all other considerations. As well, the strength (and weakness) of the gag stip is that it\’s quickly digested. Some folks are willing, and able to, sit down for the twenty or thirty minutes needed to read a graphic novel-sized work. But for the most part online reading is done in quick bursts. Never underestimate the power of gold-bricking.

    So, online \”graphic novelists\” needed to adapt to these habits by providing a quick burst of comic on a regular basis. And if you take into consideration things like having day jobs, a social life, and sleep, this works out for the artists as well.

Leave a Reply

Captcha
Enter the letters you see above.